<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital vs Physical Album Sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kokopellitimes.com/digital-vs-physical-album-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kokopellitimes.com/digital-vs-physical-album-sales/</link>
	<description>Global Music Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:03:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason A. Staples</title>
		<link>http://www.kokopellitimes.com/digital-vs-physical-album-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason A. Staples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kokopellitimes.com/?p=369#comment-30</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not especially surprising to me. I don&#039;t like buying my music in a downloaded format. For one, the quality is usually way lower than what I like for my music (I use LAME -V2 settings for music tracks). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What I can&#039;t understand is why anyone would buy a track that&#039;s 128 kbps or even 256 kbps when he/she can get a much better optimized track for about the same price? This is even more true when we&#039;re talking about DRM-protected tracks, which are irritating.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I usually buy my CDs online as cheaply as possible, which usually amounts to buying them used. The exception is when I buy directly from an artist (at a show, etc.) that I really like and want to support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s not especially surprising to me. I don&#39;t like buying my music in a downloaded format. For one, the quality is usually way lower than what I like for my music (I use LAME -V2 settings for music tracks). </p>
<p>What I can&#39;t understand is why anyone would buy a track that&#39;s 128 kbps or even 256 kbps when he/she can get a much better optimized track for about the same price? This is even more true when we&#39;re talking about DRM-protected tracks, which are irritating.</p>
<p>I usually buy my CDs online as cheaply as possible, which usually amounts to buying them used. The exception is when I buy directly from an artist (at a show, etc.) that I really like and want to support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

